Our learning programmes are free. We do not equate a website visit, worksheet download or encouraging comment with proven conservation, safer schools or completed projects. This framework explains what evidence would be needed before making progressively stronger claims.
A person can use a free learning resource without becoming an Apollo customer. Publishing educational material may have social value, but the evidence of that value must be kept separate from promotional claims and commercial conversions.
Each higher level requires additional independent evidence. Lower-level analytics cannot be promoted into higher-level achievements.
Possible supporting evidence
Possible supporting evidence
Possible supporting evidence
Possible supporting evidence
Possible supporting evidence
These rules govern editorial claims and independent documentation. They do not invite visitors to upload confidential school records, children's work, health details or cultural information.
State the source, geography and exact time period for any reported number.
Separate page visits, unique consented sessions and actual learning uses.
Require permission and adequate documentation before identifying any school, institution or community.
Do not collect student names, grades, health records or other sensitive information through public feedback.
Never report conservation, heat reduction or health outcomes unless an independent specialist evaluation establishes them.
Make uncertainty, missing data, analytics-consent limitations and corrections visible.
Keep educational reporting independent of Apollo's commercial supply pipeline and quotation totals.
Apollo's private consent-dependent dashboard can report basic interactions and optional usefulness feedback categories. Institutional adoption and physical outcomes require separate verified evidence before any corresponding public claims could be made.