Is this site ready for a modular pump-track review?

Answer six early-stage questions. This does not approve the site or replace local design, engineering, safety, accessibility or civil review—it tells you what to investigate next.

0 / 6planning questions answered

Who is the primary user?

This affects supervision, circulation and the type of layout worth investigating.

How much usable space do you have?

Use the clear usable area, not the property boundary.

What is the current supporting surface?

The exact base requirement is project-specific, but early knowledge helps avoid false starts.

How well is drainage understood?

The track cannot solve a site drainage problem by itself.

Can you provide space around the track?

Allow for access, waiting, supervision, circulation and clear areas in addition to the catalogue footprint.

Will the project need to change over time?

Relocation, staged investment and future expansion are key reasons to consider modular construction.

Add to the project brief

Give Apollo the actual site context.

These fields are optional for the checker, but they make the handoff into a real project review much more useful.

Usable site dimensionsProject location

Complete all six questions to see the planning result.

The checker deliberately avoids guessing when site information is missing.

Need more context?

Use the learning pathway that matches the project.

SchoolsSchool Learning CentreTeaching, supervision and progression CouncilsCouncil Learning CentreNeed, site scoring and procurement DevelopersDeveloper + MasterplanningStaging, precincts and handover Pump Track 101Shared Planning GuideCore concepts before layout selection Working packsPrintable Project ResourcesBriefs, scorecards and handover sheets Technical evidenceRIDEspan Evidence CentreConfirmed, verification-required and project-specific evidence