Start with geometry
CADARN has a locked maximum of 6 × 4 m / 24 m² for the current NZ pathway. ARKEN is evaluated as an architectural system with configuration-dependent spans and project-specific engineering.
Louvre Pergolas NZ / New Zealand
CADARN vs ARKEN Louvre Systems NZ
CADARN and ARKEN solve different project briefs. CADARN is the controlled modular / kitset pathway with limited made-to-measure flexibility, while ARKEN is the architectural pathway for projects that need broader customisation, larger-span options or more complex roof behaviour.
New Zealand search owner Manual project review Exact-system evidence only
Direct answer
The short version.
Choose CADARN when the project fits a disciplined modular envelope and value, repeatability and straightforward supply are the priority. Choose ARKEN when architecture, span, opening behaviour, geometry or project-specific engineering drives the brief. Do not treat them as interchangeable price tiers.
Project decision
What matters before product selection.
Use these points to structure the first project conversation. Final suitability stays tied to the actual site, selected system and local project team.
Start with the design outcome
CADARN is strongest where a modular freestanding or wall-attached louvre system fits the site. ARKEN becomes more relevant where retracting louvres, larger spans, multi-bay layouts or architectural integration matter.
Compare the project team
Both pathways remain supply-focused, but complex ARKEN projects are more likely to need architect, engineer and local contractor coordination earlier in the process.
Compare lifecycle and enclosure
Lighting, drainage, screens, sliding glass and other enclosure interfaces should be planned before final selection so the roof choice supports the finished outdoor room rather than only the first-stage structure.
Comparison matrix
CADARN and ARKEN at a glance
Use this as a first filter, then move into the exact product pages.
| Question | CADARN | ARKEN |
|---|---|---|
| Project type | Modular / kitset | Architectural / made-to-measure |
| Current NZ planning envelope | Up to 6 × 4 m / 24 m² | Configuration and engineering dependent |
| Best fit | Residential, repeatable layouts, controlled scope | Premium residential, hospitality, commercial, larger or more complex projects |
| Selection driver | Value + modular fit | Architecture + engineering + opening behaviour |
Project brief
Information worth collecting before quotation.
01Overall width, projection and height
02Freestanding or wall-attached preference
03Required opening behaviour
04Wind / coastal exposure
05Enclosure, blind or sliding-glass requirements
06Local engineer / builder involvement
Frequently asked
Answers without oversimplifying the project.
Does Apollo supply CADARN and ARKEN louvre systems in New Zealand?
Yes. Apollo reviews suitable New Zealand projects through the relevant product pathway. Exact configuration, availability, documentation and freight are confirmed for the actual project rather than assumed from a generic page.
Does Apollo install CADARN and ARKEN louvre systems?
Apollo is primarily supply-only. Local design, engineering, approvals, foundations, electrical work and installation remain with the appointed New Zealand project team unless expressly included in a written project scope.
What should I send for an initial review?
Send the project location, intended use, dimensions or drawings, photographs, target timing and any known wind, coastal, drainage, access, power or local-compliance requirements relevant to the product.
Next step
Turn the research into a real project brief.
Send the site, dimensions, intended use, quantities and known local requirements. Apollo will review the relevant product pathway and keep local engineering, approvals and site-work responsibilities explicit.