Current product information
Use current dimensions, options, materials, finishes and documented performance for the exact selected system rather than carrying legacy or supplier model data into the specification.
New Zealand New Zealand Sectors / New Zealand
Apollo supports New Zealand architects, designers, consultants and project managers with controlled product information, specification pathways, drawings and project-file review across façades, glass, outdoor architecture, sports, public realm and specialist systems.

Direct answer
For New Zealand specification work, use the exact Apollo product owner and current technical record, then separate verified product information from project-specific engineering, Building Code, consent and local installation responsibilities. Apollo can review drawings and product intent without replacing the appointed consultants.
Project decision
Use these points to structure the first project conversation. Final suitability stays tied to the actual site, selected system and local project team.
Use current dimensions, options, materials, finishes and documented performance for the exact selected system rather than carrying legacy or supplier model data into the specification.
Structure, fixings, drainage, electrical, waterproofing, access and maintenance zones should be coordinated early with the local design team.
Where controlled CAD, BIM, test reports, certificates, samples or specifications exist, they should be tied to the exact product and revision rather than treated as generic evidence.
Building Code interfaces, local engineering, consent, producer statements and construction documentation remain project-specific and should be allocated to the appropriate New Zealand professionals.
Use Apollo's technical centre, specifier library and project upload workflow to keep product identity, substitutions and current documentation traceable through procurement.
Comparison matrix
Move from design intent to a controlled product record.
| Stage | Apollo pathway | Project-team responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Concept | Product family, application and option review | Design intent, site criteria and consultant brief |
| Design development | Dimensions, materials, finishes, interfaces | Structure, drainage, services and compliance strategy |
| Tender | Specification record, technical documents, samples where available | Tender clauses, approved substitutions and local documentation |
| Procurement | Final configuration, quantities and revision check | Construction coordination and installer scope |
| Site | Supply information and product support | Installation, inspection, commissioning and statutory sign-off |
Project brief
Frequently asked
Yes. Drawings can be uploaded for product-pathway and interface review. Apollo does not replace the appointed architect, engineer or other project consultants.
Where current controlled files exist for the selected system, Apollo can provide or route them through the technical project process.
Product evidence can support the project team, but project-specific compliance, consent and engineering remain dependent on the exact design, site and appointed New Zealand professionals.
Next step
Send the site, dimensions, intended use, quantities and known local requirements. Apollo will review the relevant product pathway and keep local engineering, approvals and site-work responsibilities explicit.