Skip to main content
Apollo NZ GlobalInternational

Decision Centre / Global

Covered court, air dome or enclosed sports hall?

These are different building and operating models. The right starting point depends on enclosure, climate control, permanence, services, project programme and local approvals.

Global / overseas search owner Manual project review Exact-system evidence only
Covered sports facility with clear-span roof structure

Direct answer

The short version.

Use an open-sided covered court when overhead weather protection is the main goal; an air dome when a large enclosed volume and rapid enclosure pathway suit the project; and a sports hall when a more permanent conventional or clear-span enclosed building is required.

Project decision

What matters before product selection.

Use these points to structure the first project conversation. Final suitability stays tied to the actual site, selected system and local project team.

Open-sided cover

A roof structure can reduce rain and solar exposure while retaining natural ventilation and an outdoor operating model.

Air-supported dome

A dome creates an enclosed volume using air pressure and membrane systems, introducing blower, airlock, emergency and operating requirements.

Sports hall

A framed enclosed hall provides a more conventional building envelope and can integrate changing, spectator, acoustic and service systems at higher project complexity.

Comparison matrix

Covered Court vs Air Dome vs Sports Hall — project comparison

Use this as an early project-screening matrix. Final suitability depends on the exact system, site, configuration and project requirements.

FactorCovered courtAir domeSports hall
EnclosureOpen / partialEnclosed membraneEnclosed building
PermanenceProject dependentSemi-permanent / project dependentPermanent pathway
Mechanical relianceLow to moderateHigh — air supportBuilding services dependent
Climate controlLimitedPossible / system dependentHighest potential
Project complexityModerateSpecialistHigh

Project brief

Information worth collecting before quotation.

01Sports and court count
02Required enclosure
03Climate / weather
04Operating season
05Power reliability
06Site footprint
07Changing / spectator needs
08Local approvals

Frequently asked

Answers without oversimplifying the project.

Is one option always the right choice?

No. The useful choice depends on the project outcome, site conditions, scale, local work, operating expectations, maintenance and required technical evidence.

Does Apollo calculate a universal online price from this comparison?

No. Apollo uses a manual project-brief and quotation process so product family, quantity, destination, freight, configuration and project interfaces are reviewed before pricing.

Who handles local design, approvals and installation?

Apollo is primarily supply-only. Local engineering, approvals, foundations, services, installation and other site work remain with the appointed local project team unless a written scope states otherwise.

Next step

Turn the research into a real project brief.

Send the site, dimensions, intended use, quantities and known local requirements. Apollo will review the relevant product pathway and keep local engineering, approvals and site-work responsibilities explicit.

Build a covered-sports brief
Project