Skip to main content
Apollo NZ GlobalStart Project Brief

Development & Humanitarian Infrastructure · Free quotation comparison guide

How to Compare Modular Housing Quotations

Two modular-housing prices can look similar while covering very different scopes. This guide helps project teams normalise quotations before making a commercial comparison, so missing services, documentation, freight or local-work assumptions do not disappear behind a unit price.

Planning guidance — final supplied configuration remains project-specific.
Modular housing quotation comparison and procurement planning reference
01

Start by normalising the unit being compared

Confirm whether the price is per structural module, completed dwelling, bedroom, square metre or project package. A two-module family home should not be compared directly with a single-module price without converting both quotations to the same delivered housing outcome.

Record floor area, room count, module count and final dwelling configuration beside the quoted price.

02

Separate included, excluded and provisional scope

List structure, walls, roof, insulation, finishes, windows, doors, bathroom, kitchen, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, stairs, decks, foundations, external utilities, freight, unloading, assembly and commissioning line by line.

Where an item is provisional, clarify the assumption and who carries the cost risk if it changes.

03

Compare technical evidence, not just specification words

A quotation that states fireproof, cyclone rated or insulated is not enough on its own. Ask what material, build-up, test report, calculation or project-specific engineering supports the proposed configuration.

Evidence should match the quoted system and should not be treated as transferable from an unrelated model without confirmation.

04

Bring logistics into the comparison

Compare units per container, package dimensions and weights, destination freight assumptions, handling equipment, storage, inland transport and assembly requirements. A lower factory price can be offset by poor packing efficiency or difficult site handling.

05

Compare programme risk

Review realistic production capacity, engineering lead time, approval cycle, sample or pilot stage, manufacturing duration, inspection, shipping sequence, spare-parts route and warranty support. The cheapest initial unit is not necessarily the lowest-risk programme.

Comparison reference

Modular housing quotation comparison matrix

Planning criterionQuotation AQuotation BQuestion to resolve
Final dwelling basisRecord floor area / rooms / modulesRecord floor area / rooms / modulesAre both prices for the same usable housing outcome?
Factory completionList finishes, bathroom, kitchen, MEPList finishes, bathroom, kitchen, MEPWhat must still be completed locally?
Technical evidenceList calculations / reports / drawingsList calculations / reports / drawingsDoes evidence match the exact quoted configuration?
FreightPacking quantity, weights, handover pointPacking quantity, weights, handover pointWhich quotation has the lower total logistics burden?
Local worksFoundations, utilities, assembly, approvalsFoundations, utilities, assembly, approvalsWhich costs are outside the supplier quotation?
Programme supportCapacity, QA, spares, warrantyCapacity, QA, spares, warrantyWhich supplier can support the required scale and handover?

This comparison framework does not select a supplier. It helps ensure competing quotations are being evaluated on the same project basis.

Move from knowledge to project

Apply this guidance to the actual site.

Start Project Brief
Project