Start Project BriefSPORT + KNOWLEDGE · ATHREN FIELD
A replacement field is not automatically a like-for-like turf swap. Existing shockpad condition, drainage, base tolerances, changed sport use, current performance requirements and disposal logistics should be reviewed before the new system is selected.
Record the existing turf system, installation date if known, shockpad, infill, drainage, base, seam failures, wear zones and any field-test history. Do not assume the existing underlying layers can simply remain.
A club may now need different sport sharing, competition level, training hours, maintenance resources or federation requirements. The replacement is an opportunity to correct a system that no longer matches how the field is used.
Existing shockpads and bases need condition review against the requirements of the proposed new system. Reuse should be evidence-based, not assumed because the layer is still physically present.
Removal sequencing, roll handling, infill recovery or disposal, temporary storage, access and delivery of the replacement system should be included in the programme before the field is taken out of service.
Where a performance or certification pathway applies, confirm what testing is required after resurfacing. Store the new TDS, installation record, warranty and maintenance documents against the replacement project.
Reference this resource
Link to the live page rather than a saved copy so readers reach the current Apollo planning resource and its latest product and planning links.
apollonzglobal.com/knowledge-centre/sports-courts/synthetic-field-replacement-resurfacing-planningMove from knowledge to project