Skip to main content
Apollo NZ GlobalStart Project Brief

FÍSVOR · APPLICATION CLASS

Covered vs partial sun vs full sun outdoor displays.

'Outdoor' is too broad. A shaded patio TV and a west-facing full-sun commercial display are fundamentally different thermal and visibility applications.

SHORT ANSWER

Classify the exposure before selecting brightness or screen size.

Covered applications avoid direct sun and are mainly weather/ambient-light problems. Partial-sun applications see limited direct sun and need stronger brightness/thermal margin. Full-sun applications require explicit panel-temperature and thermal-design evidence for sustained direct solar exposure.

KEY PROJECT POINTS

What should drive the decision.

These are project inputs, not substitute engineering or automatic product approvals.

01

Roof cover does not always prevent low-angle sun.

02

West/east orientations can create intense seasonal direct sun.

03

Full sun should be evidence-gated, not marketing-gated.

04

Wind-driven rain can affect covered locations.

05

Mounting cavities can trap heat.

06

Dual-sided enclosures create different thermal loads.

COMPARISON

Use-case fit before product preference.

The table is deliberately directional. Exact configurations still require project and evidence review.

PathwayBest fitWatch closely
CoveredPatios, verandas, recessed walls and sheltered hospitality spaces without direct solar exposure.Ambient brightness, wind-driven rain, enclosure ventilation and low-angle sun.
Partial sunLocations with limited/seasonal direct sun or bright open shade.Sun duration, orientation, brightness margin and panel temperature.
Full sunUnshaded direct-sun commercial installations with exact product thermal qualification.Panel-temperature evidence, active thermal design, warranty and service access.
01

Map sun by time and season

Site photos and orientation help identify when direct sun reaches the display—not just whether a roof exists.

02

Check mounting thermal conditions

Recessed walls, cabinets, freestanding housings and dual-sided displays can change airflow and heat rejection.

03

Separate weather and sun

Ingress protection addresses water/dust; direct-sun suitability requires separate thermal evidence.

04

Specify the application class on the project

Tender schedules should state Covered / Partial Sun / Full Sun so bidders return products against the same exposure assumption.

PROJECT INPUTS

What to have ready before asking for the exact system.

A stronger brief shortens the gap between product interest and a useful technical/commercial response.

01

Site orientation

02

Roof/overhang

03

Direct-sun hours

04

Seasonal exposure

05

Ambient temperature

06

Mounting type

07

Ventilation clearance

08

Screen size

09

Brightness

10

IP/environment

11

Service access

12

Warranty conditions

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Full Sun requires verified panel temperature and thermal design.

Apollo should not describe a display as Full Sun from brightness or IP rating alone. Exact panel thermal limits, cooling design, enclosure, orientation and warranty must support the application.

FÍSVOR Outdoor Technical CentreTechnical application-class framework and exact-system qualification pathway.

FAQ

Questions project teams usually need answered.

Is a display under a pergola automatically Covered?

Not necessarily. Low-angle morning/evening sun can still strike the screen directly.

Does IP65 mean Full Sun?

No. IP ratings address ingress, not solar thermal load.

Should application class be on the tender schedule?

Yes. It helps compare products against the same exposure assumption.

Project