Show the project thinking. Publish the evidence only when it is real.
Apollo separates completed-project evidence from representative applications and planning frameworks. A page becomes a case study only when the underlying project facts and permission to publish are verified.
Evidence class stated Customer privacy protected Outcomes require project evidence
PUBLIC LIBRARY6Controlled public evidence/framework records
VERIFIED CASE STUDIES0Published only when project facts and approval support them
PLANNING FRAMEWORKS6Non-customer decision and procurement models
REGISTER REVIEW15 Sep 2026Public classification and owner links reviewed
Evidence standard
Four public evidence classes. Different proof requirements.
This prevents concept imagery, supplier references or useful planning material from being accidentally presented as an Apollo customer result.
01
Verified case study
A real project may be named only when the project facts, supplied scope and publication approval are verified. Outcomes must be supported by the project record rather than inferred from product capability.
None currently published02
Anonymised project evidence
A real project can be described without customer identity or precise location only when the underlying facts are documented and the anonymised publication is approved.
03
Representative application
Shows how a product or system may be used. It is not presented as an Apollo customer installation and must not imply a measured project outcome.
04
Planning framework
A non-customer decision or procurement model. It can explain what should be reviewed, but it cannot be described as a completed project or customer result.
Public project library
Evidence and frameworks with the status stated.
The current public library contains planning frameworks only. That is deliberate: useful decision guidance is published now, while customer project claims remain behind the verification gate.
1 matching records
Planning framework
01Councils & public realm
Council park recreation package framework
A non-customer procurement framework for councils planning courts, modular pump tracks, sports lighting, VAKTAR AI cameras, shade and CIVARO public-realm systems within one park or recreation brief.
Evidence basisApollo procurement model · non-customer frameworkReviewed 15 Sep 2026
What this record reviews
Community outcome and target users
Lifecycle, maintenance and accessibility interfaces
Technology, lighting and operating policy
Staging, public-space design and local approvals
Framework value
Separates supplied recreation systems from local public-space design, civil works and statutory responsibilities while preserving a staged expansion pathway.
Private project records do not belong in public frontend code.
Customer names, exact locations, quotations, drawings, contact information and internal project files stay outside this public evidence register. If a future project is approved for publication, only the approved evidence record is added here.
Case-study gate
A real project can move public only after verification.
A public completed-project case should identify the supplied scope, distinguish Apollo supply from local works, document the project facts used in the story and record permission for the level of identification being published.