Outdoor Living & Architecture · Retractable-roof comparison

Retractable Fabric Roof vs Retractable Louvre Roof

Both systems can create a substantially open roof condition, but they do it with different materials, mechanics and architectural character.

Planning guidance — final supplied configuration remains project-specific.

Retractable fabric architectural roof partly open above a hospitality terrace

FASGAR RETRACT uses a flexible membrane

The roof membrane extends for shelter and retracts into a stacked zone when the project wants open sky. It is well suited to hospitality and larger terrace applications where a fabric-roof aesthetic is acceptable.

ORELAN retractable louvres retain aluminium blades

ORELAN's open-sky pathway combines blade rotation with roof retraction, giving the project both adjustable louvre control and a substantially open roof condition.

Choose by architecture and operating brief

Compare desired appearance, open-sky percentage, drainage, controls, maintenance, side enclosure, exposure and evidence requirements before choosing the system family.

Continue planning

Related Outdoor Living & Architecture resources

FASGAR RETRACTOpen resource ORELAN Retractable Louvre RoofsOpen resource Roof System ComparisonOpen resource

Reference this resource

Use the permanent Apollo page when sharing or citing this guide.

Link to the live page rather than a saved copy so readers reach the current Apollo planning resource and its latest controlled product links.

Permanent guide URLapollonzglobal.com/knowledge-centre/outdoor-living-architecture/retractable-fabric-roof-vs-retractable-louvre-roof

Move from knowledge to project

Apply this guidance to the actual site.

Build Project Brief