Overhead architecture
ARKEN, FASGAR and AUVENOR cover different louvre, fixed and moving-roof behaviours for terraces where overhead control is the main requirement.
United Kingdom United Kingdom / Decision guide
UK hospitality projects often need rain management, wind control, adaptable enclosure and seasonal use without turning every terrace into the same structure. The first decision is whether the main problem is overhead cover, adjustable roof control, shade, or side screening.

Direct answer
Use ARKEN where premium louvre architecture and adjustable overhead control lead; FASGAR or AUVENOR where the main requirement is fixed or moving roof cover; KAVORA where shade and lighter retractable coverage lead; and LUNVIQ where side screening, wind moderation, privacy or enclosure is the primary problem.
Project decision
These comparisons are designed to narrow the project route. They do not replace local engineering, authority review or exact-system technical evidence.
ARKEN, FASGAR and AUVENOR cover different louvre, fixed and moving-roof behaviours for terraces where overhead control is the main requirement.
KAVORA suits umbrellas, awnings, membrane and lighter retractable shade where a full outdoor-room structure is unnecessary.
LUNVIQ addresses large-format outdoor roller screening where privacy, wind moderation, solar control or side enclosure is the project driver.
Comparison matrix
Wind, rain exposure, drainage, fixing structure, planning and local project requirements still need exact-system review.
| Need | Starting pathway | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Adjustable louvre roof | ARKEN | Blade control + architectural integration |
| Fixed / retractable roof | FASGAR / AUVENOR | Roof-led weather strategy |
| Shade / awning | KAVORA | Lighter or freestanding coverage |
| Side screen / enclosure | LUNVIQ | Vertical weather / privacy control |
Project brief
Frequently asked
No. The decision page is a shortlisting tool. Final suitability depends on the actual site, use, dimensions, exposure, selected system, available evidence and local project requirements.
Apollo is supply-led. Local engineering, approvals, foundations, services, installation and other site works remain with the appointed local project team unless a written project scope expressly includes something different.
No. Apollo uses a manual project-brief process so the selected system, quantities, destination, freight and project interfaces are reviewed before pricing.
Next step
Send the site, dimensions, use, quantities, exposure information and known local requirements. Apollo can then review the relevant systems, evidence, freight and supply scope.